Post

 Resources 

Console


RE: It IS the width. This is crap!!! Jack Hoxley (5 replies, 0 views) (2000-Jun-11)
-
Not all cards support surfaces wider than the primary buffer. my card doesn't. You realise that the surfaces your talking about will need a powerful gfx card with lots of RAM to store it..... think 2044 x 640 = 1308160 pixels. PyroBoy wrote: ------------------------------- Looks like it's the width of the surface that's screwing things up. Everything up to 2044 pixels wide works in 16 bit, and now 24 bit seems to be working fine, despite the fact that I didn't change anything. So why is it limiting me to 2044 in 16 bit mode and working fine in 24? My old card didn't have any of these problems and it's ancient. Are all video cards this fucked up or is it just mine?


-
Up One Level | Back to Forum

Well... PyroBoy (4 replies) (2000-Jun-11)
RE: Well... Jack Hoxley (3 replies) (2000-Jun-12)
RE: Well... PyroBoy (2 replies) (2000-Jun-12)
RE: Well... Adam Hoult (0 replies) (2000-Jun-12)
RE: Well... Jack Hoxley (0 replies) (2000-Jun-13)

Copyright © 2002 - 2004 Eric Coleman, Peter Kuchnio , et. al.
There have been 40 visitors within the last 20 minutes
RSS News Feed