VBGamer |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I have to *gasp* disagree with Almar Brykovian (9 replies, 0 views) (2001-Jun-1) Sorry, man, but I think that originality *is* rewarded, if it has good entertainment value to it. Tetris didn't break any technical barriers, but it was unlike anything before it for a game idea and became a huge hit. However, I haven't seen any huge tetris-like sequels ...
As for DDCK, Peter, it has some things that are quite original to it in concept/back story and the graphics *are* good ... but, if you are truly looking for some constructive comments, let me know and I'll e-mail my thoughts to you directly ...
Cheers,
-Bryk
|