Post

 Resources 

Console


Re: Snorlack's Treasure Goes Gold - Matt_Giuca (0 replies, 1072 views) (2005-Jan-1)
-
Hi all, thanks to everyone who played my games.
Mack - if you had paid money for this game then I think your complaints would be warranted. Although I personally go for a good game with good gamplay over the graphics, unfortunately, you are right.
 
Its sad that so many people will turn down both of these games and just so so many others simply because the graphics are bad/nonexistant. I won't mind if you tell me that the gameplay itself is boring, or repetitive or whatever. But to say "this game is boring because it doesn't have dynamic shadows" is quite immature.
 
>How old are the programmers of this game?
Old enough to appreciate games that were around BEFORE the world got hooked on graphics.
Old enough to play a game before publically slanging it based on screenshots.
Old enough (and experienced enough) to know how much effort goes into making even games like this.
 
I'd like to thank Sion and Lachlan for their comments (the latter of whom has offered very helpful constructive criticizm in the past - by the way Lachlan your suggestions have been added to Rul'Shath, they worked very well, but the latest version has not been released yet). Seasons greetings to everyone, and I hope some of you will be able to get some enjoyment out of these games.



-
Up One Level | Back to News


Copyright © 2002 - 2004 Eric Coleman, Peter Kuchnio , et. al.
There have been 37 visitors within the last 20 minutes
RSS News Feed