Post

 Resources 

Console


RE: Is CopyMemory faster than ... Jack Hoxley (2 replies, 0 views) (2000-Jun-25)
-
I think the assembler alogrithm is probably the CopyMemory Library. Despite what you may think/complain about - the Windows API are highly optimised and a lot of the time-critical stuff is written in the low-level languages (such as ASM). I wrote a C++ DLL that did a Blt-Not on a surface. In theory it could do 614,400 changes in UNDER 1ms (I got divide by 0 errors when doing averages in VB). The same took 170ms in VB.


-
Up One Level | Back to Forum

RE: Is CopyMemory faster than ... The Gilb (1 reply) (2000-Jun-26)
RE: Is CopyMemory faster than ... Jack Hoxley (0 replies) (2000-Jun-26)

Copyright © 2002 - 2004 Eric Coleman, Peter Kuchnio , et. al.
There have been 49 visitors within the last 20 minutes
RSS News Feed